CourtPulse

federal enforcement actions, filings and court records, from official sources

••• ⚠️ Newsticker presented by CFExclusion.com ⚠️ ••• 🚨 FRAUD WATCH — Federal authorities announced charges against 16 noncitizens in alleged election-related crimes, including illegal voting and fraudulent voter registration; defendants remain presumed innocent.  • 🤖 AI SECURITY — Researchers report autonomous AI agents attempting hacking techniques against government websites, while malicious AI tools are increasingly being used in cyberattacks.  • 💻 ONLINE THEFT — The FBI says multiple suspects have been arrested in the ShinyHunters data-theft investigation following attacks involving stolen information and extortion.  • 🇺🇸 TRUMP — Trump announced a federal “Super Intelligence Force” to coordinate America’s AI strategy and maintain U.S. technological leadership.  • 🏛️ POLITICS — With one month until the midterms, control of Congress is tightening into a major national battle.  • 🔎 AI SCREENING — As fraud, stolen identities and automated attacks accelerate, AI-based scre
Records through Sunday, October 11, 2026 DOJ · SEC · FTC · FDA · CFPB · CFTC · FINRA · OCC · Federal Register · CourtListener · SCOTUSblog

Records collected on Thursday, September 17, 2026

54 records, grouped by source. Every entry links to the official source.

Daily brief · September 17, 2026

Federal courts and agencies post 54 records, led by judicial filings

Today's 54 official federal records include 19 court filings, 13 from the International Trade Administration, and 8 from the Department of Justice. The records also include 6 SEC company filings and 8 records from other federal agencies and commissions.

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission · CFTC press release

    CFTC Secures Court Order Directing Florida Man to Pay Over $6 Million for Options Fraud and Imposing Trading Bans

    A U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut entered a default judgment against a Florida man for options fraud, ordering him to pay $547,616 in restitution to defrauded clients and a $5,907,720 civil monetary penalty, and imposing permanent trading and registration bans. The defendant is alleged to have fraudulently solicited funds from at least 26 retail clients purportedly for options trading on commodity futures, but the promised trading did not occur and client funds were misappropriated. The court separately ordered two relief defendants to disgorge $110,509.86 in ill-gotten client funds.

    Why it matters: The judgment resolves a 2024 CFTC enforcement action and imposes financial penalties and permanent trading bans on the defendant, affecting his ability to conduct futures and options trading.

  2. U.S. Department of Justice · DOJ press release

    Department of Justice Again Wins Substantial Relief Against Google

    The U.S. Department of Justice announced that a federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia ordered substantial relief against Google in a monopolization case involving advertising technology markets. The court imposed behavioral remedies including required integrations with open-source Prebid, data-sharing requirements, non-discriminatory bidding rules for AdWords, and appointment of a monitor for six years to oversee Google's compliance.

    Why it matters: The ruling enforces antitrust law by requiring structural changes to Google's ad tech products and creates ongoing court oversight to restore competition in markets the DOJ alleges Google unlawfully dominated.

  3. Federal Trade Commission · FTC press release

    FTC Takes Action to Prevent Anticompetitive Arrangement in Beretta, Ruger Deal

    The Federal Trade Commission accepted a proposed consent order resolving antitrust concerns over a stock purchase agreement between firearm manufacturers Beretta Holding S.A. and Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc. The order prohibits Beretta from appointing or nominating anyone to Ruger's board unless that person is independent of Beretta, and requires Beretta to provide 15 days' advance written notice before any board appointment and to avoid certain relationships with independent directors that could compromise their fiduciary duty or share nonpublic information.

    Why it matters: The consent order, subject to 30 days of public comment, settles allegations that the stock deal would create an illegal interlocking directorate in violation of Section 8 of the Clayton Act and prevents potential anticompetitive coordination between two major competitors.

  4. Federal and state courts (via CourtListener) · Court opinion

    Pryce v. Nationstar Mtge., LLC

    The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a trial court order that had denied a plaintiff's motion to renew a prior summary judgment motion in an action to cancel and discharge a mortgage. The court held that the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA), enacted in 2022, established that the discontinuance of the 2009 foreclosure action did not revoke the acceleration of the mortgage debt, and therefore the six-year statute of limitations for foreclosure had expired in 2015, making a new foreclosure action time-barred.

    Why it matters: This decision permits the plaintiff's action to proceed to cancel the mortgage as a matter of law, affecting the rights of the mortgagor and the mortgage holder in this property dispute.

  5. Federal and state courts (via CourtListener) · Court opinion

    Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by two federally recognized tribes challenging Kalshi's "event contracts" on tribal lands. The court held that the tribes were likely to succeed in showing that Kalshi's sports event contracts violated the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the tribes' gaming ordinances, and that IGRA was not displaced by the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act or the Commodity Exchange Act.

    Why it matters: The ruling permits the tribes to proceed with seeking a preliminary injunction on their IGRA claims and requires the district court to consider remaining preliminary injunction factors, affecting the availability of prediction market contracts on tribal lands.

  6. Federal and state courts (via CourtListener) · Court opinion

    Chanwn A. Francois v. Executive Towing & Recovery, Inc.

    The District Court of Appeal of Florida reversed a trial court judgment in favor of Executive Towing & Recovery, Inc. The court found that Executive failed to strictly comply with Florida Statute § 713.78 by not providing required notice to the vehicle owner within five business days after storage began on October 16, 2024; notice was not sent until October 26, 2024, and the court held that strict compliance with statutory notice requirements is mandatory for a towing operator's lien to be enforceable.

    Why it matters: The reversal means the trial court judgment is vacated and the case returns for further proceedings; the vehicle owner may pursue claims for illegal towing and wrongful possession, and the towing company cannot enforce its lien or sell the vehicle due to failure to meet statutory notice deadlines.

  7. Federal and state courts (via CourtListener) · Court opinion

    In Re SCP 3330 Brighton OPCO, LLC; SCP 3330 Brighton, LLC; SCP 3350 Brighton, LLC; and SCP 3330 Brighton Garage, LLC, Plaintiffs: v. Mountain Cement Company LLC, Defendant:

    The Supreme Court of Colorado held that a party who waives a jury trial right cannot revive it by filing an amended complaint unless the amendment raises new triable issues of fact not in the original pleadings. The plaintiffs' amended complaint added continuing trespass and continuing nuisance claims based on the same underlying facts and sought exemplary damages, which the court found did not constitute new triable issues; therefore, the plaintiffs' jury demand was untimely and their previously waived jury trial right was not revived.

    Why it matters: This ruling establishes when a party in Colorado civil litigation may demand a jury trial after initially waiving that right, directly affecting the procedural course and trial format in cases where amended pleadings are filed.

  8. Federal and state courts (via CourtListener) · Court opinion

    Gregory Freiberg v. Xonar Technology, Inc.

    The Delaware Court of Chancery ruled in favor of Xonar Technology Inc. in a stockholder removal dispute. Gregory Freiberg challenged his removal from the company's board in January 2026, alleging the capitalization table was inaccurate; the court found that Freiberg failed to prove that later-secured written consents should be excluded from the majority count, and therefore entered judgment for the defendant without reaching the second triable issue.

    Why it matters: This decision concludes litigation under Delaware General Corporation Law Section 225 and determines the validity of Freiberg's removal from the board, affecting his status as a stockholder and officer of Xonar Technology Inc.

Also filed today

By the numbers

Sources: cftc.gov, justice.gov, ftc.gov, courtlistener.com. Compiled from official releases; not legal or investment advice. Summaries are written from the official source text and checked against it before publication; records whose official page cannot be read are listed by title only.

Daily email

Today's new records, once a day, from CourtPulse.

One email a day. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy

U.S. Department of Justice 8

Company filings on SEC EDGAR 6

Federal Trade Commission 1

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce 13

U.S. International Trade Commission 1

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1

Other federal agencies (via the Federal Register) 4

Federal and state courts (via CourtListener) 19